State of Wednesday: LIBERAL POLITICIAN DISCOVERS CONSEQUENCES OF LIBERALISM
Sound familiar?
Greetings, Dear Reader,
We’re going to keep this one short and sweet.
Who gives a d*mn about Canada, right?
Well, for one thing, a lot of my favorite comedians are Canadian. Indeed, if it’s one export I’ll gladly take from them, it’s comedy.
Speaking of …
LIBERAL POLITICIAN DISCOVERS CONSEQUENCES OF LIBERALISM
A strong champion of “multiculturalism, diversity and inclusion as core Canadian values” just suffered the results of it in an election more fit for the third world than North America.
As a result, one-time Liberal MP Nate Erskine-Smith is challenging results declaring Ahsanul Hafiz (whose name sounds like a sneeze), the winner in the Ontario Liberal Party leadership election.
(Disclosure: I might have gotten some of the political nomenclature there wrong. I’m not going to pretend like I understand Canada’s stupid political system. Also, it’s not important.)
Erskine-Smith lost by 19 votes in an election that he says had 34 more votes than registered voters.
Sound familiar?
It gets worse. Despite setting the rules clearly before the election, it seems like poll organizers promptly allowed almost all of them to be violated. Standard voter ID was required, yet voters used stuff like Amazon receipts, unsigned leases, academic “report cards.” “Asylum seekers” claimed they had just moved and didn’t have ID. One used a “visitors visa” as proof of identity. All still allowed to vote.
People in the voting booths were taking phone calls while they voted. On speaker phone! They were photographing their ballots in the voting booth. Vote buying is illegal, but not if you’re brown and seeking “asylum” from places where folks poop on public streets.
The Globe and Mail, a somewhat reliably centrist paper, reported that poll organizers basically lost control of the polling station. People lingered around after voting. People left and came back. They used the exit as an entrance. The Hafiz campaign even allegedly had officials in and around the polling places “instructing” people how to vote.
The campaign also made a big effort to organize “visitors” and “non-citizen” voters!
I’m not sure if that’s even legal in Canada. Probably so because Canada is gay.
Is anyone shocked that liberal bureaucrats were not going to raise a fuss over “immigrants of color” flagrantly undermining big D democracy in plain view of the public? Of course not. Better to lose rigged elections than be called a racist, eh?
This sounds like how elections go in third world hellholes, and that’s because it is.
Now Erskine-Smith wants to not only investigate and audit the election for a potential redo, he wants Ontario to codify that only citizens and permanent residents can vote. How racist!
In 1984, when Erskine-Smith was born, the district was only 13% “visible minority.” Christianity was far and away the dominant religion. Canadians of European descent have since shrunk to less than 25 percent of the population. The top demo? Bangladeshi immigrant. Hinduism and Islam have predictably supplanted Christ.
This is what you get, is it not? This is the result of your support for “diversity” and “mass immigration.” Chaos in polling places. Fake identification. Rigged ballots. Sham elections. The call to prayer. Multi-armed statues. Pretty soon, human doo-doo on once-clean streets.
If only liberals here at home would take note.
MORE LINKS
Trump Tells Daily Caller Reporter He Doesn’t ‘Think About’ Americans’ Finances In Waging Iran War
Did you see this?!
ROOKE: Trump’s Housing Revolution Takes Direct Aim At Biggest Crisis Young Americans Face
Some non-Iran news from Trump.
State Democrats Find New Way To Defund The Police
Still a beautiful state, but for how long?
Fourth Grader Sends Letter To Republican Rep. Not Sure Anyone Could Have Predicted Her Response
The congresswoman did what the parent wouldn’t.
Like what you’re reading? If so, please consider subscribing to State of the Day or sharing this with a friend. You’d be supporting this newsletter and helping keep independent journalism alive.
If you are already a paid subscriber, make sure to join the conversation in our subscribers-only chat below.
