Greetings, Dear Reader,
Let’s talk about women today. Some interesting data has been coming out lately.
Has it helped us figure out what they actually want yet, guys?
WOMEN’S STUDIES
Like many wayward, bumbling, hyper-male idiots before me, I took “women’s studies” in college to be around “chicks, duuuude.”
It was 2003, well more than a decade before the explosion of cultural Marxism became a dominant force. Nonetheless, the markers were there. The course was abject torture. The men in the class, of which I was one of three or maybe four out of 50, were tormented nonstop as a matter of course.
But I needed three credits of “other cultures” to graduate. Should have been a red flag that “women” counted as an “other culture,” but it’s likely I was too sauced to think much about it.
As we all know by now, the most ironic thing about feminist tropes is how often they revolve around men. Either they pantomime us, define themselves around our (mis)behavior, or join pout circles in which our behavior is more often than not the focus.
Even so-called independent women are defined in terms of men, ie, not needing no man.
Faced almost instantly with the realization that the course would not be providing the bountiful booty I had foolishly expected, I decided to actually intellectually engage with the coursework.
I promised no euphemisms early on, Dear Reader, so by that I mean I challenged the professor constantly, sometimes in the most obnoxious ways. Many of the women later panned the course and explicitly wrote that it was because of my participation in it.
I would eventually become proud of that. The whole charade got to the point where I was sitting in front of the dean. My professor wanted me booted from the school entirely. When that didn’t work, from the class. Then when that didn’t work, she wanted me to sign away my right to even talk. (That also didn’t work, lol, with the dean literally citing the First Amendment.)
Later she’d say she “respected” how I’d stood up for myself “in there” and ask for a hug.
Would you believe that all this would end the following semester with several more awkward, lingering “hugs” and her, a married woman, taking the most awkward run at me imaginable?
Decidedly not the sexual experience I had expected (nor did I take the opportunity, just to set you at ease, Dear Reader). Also highly confusing.
It’s been 23 years and women are still mostly a mystery. But that’s no excuse to abandon them.
—
It’s no secret that women love objectively evil men, especially if they’re good looking, and Luigi Mangione is no different.
Enter the self-dubbed “Mangionistas.” These three women made headlines outside the Mangione court proceedings for a number of reasons. Firstly, that they were given official NYC press credentials. Secondly, because they said things like Brian Thompson’s kids were “better off” with their father dead.
“I’m saying fuck Brian Thompson. I don’t give a flying fuck he died,” Ashley Rojas said.
Lena Weissbrot compared Thompson’s death to Bin Laden and said America should be celebrating. Abril Rios, who mostly just stood there looking like a stripper cop, nodded her head in approval.
The whole interaction was deranged and went viral for obvious reasons (namely that it was deranged and female).
Who educated these women?
—
Subscribe now - 25% off
This offer expires May 25
A full 65% of degree holders are now women, and everything from curriculum to the administration of universities reflects that fact.
In the media business, we call this audience capture. If the people you cater to are overwhelmingly mentally disturbed women, then barring clear-eyed, aggressive leadership, the administration of your college at every level will eventually reflect the traits of mentally disturbed women.
Read the part I highlighted here because we’re going to come back to it.
—
Abril Rios was a first-gen immigrant and was raised while repped by a modeling and talent agency. Privately educated, she later earned a degree in “comparative lit,” which is a euphemism for Marxist English. She mentions pursuit of a masters in her substack, but it’s unclear if she ever earned one.
She later helped Mamdani with his “Hot Girls for Zohran” campaign.
Weissbrot got a BFA from Florida State University, and then she got a Fulbright Scholarship to go study the “intersection of hip hop and feminism” in South Africa. A discerning man must have been nowhere in sight when this decision was made.
Less is known about Rojas, but you get the point.
This is what it means when 65% of degree holders are women. Luigi Mangione social media fan clubs and merch stores owned and operated by corrosive dullards like these three.
—
Remember all that talk about young men becoming radicalized in the online manosphere?
Surprising exactly no one, the story institutional media and elites were trying to impose upon us is the exact opposite of reality.
Women (like the Manigionistas) have become the most politically radical of the sexes.
But there’s still hope.
Leaf Arbuthnot, Basic White Lady Journalist, lamented the rise of “glamorous young women on the right” and called them the “Far Right’s … New Weapon.”
If you want to read a great breakdown by my lovely cohort, Nat Sandoval, please do click here. In it, she basically concludes that Arbuthnot’s listed qualities of “Far Right” are actually more like “Mid Right.” And that makes sense, if you consider Leaf is probably at the top end of that graph herself. Of course moderates appear extreme to you, Leaf!
My breakdown boils down to this: Women ultimately want to be led by (goodlooking, if possible) competent, masculine men, and if the political left doesn’t have a lot of those (it doesn’t), then the right is going to act as a chick magnet.
The first to go will be the most beautiful, but others will follow. I’m looking at you, Arbuthnot.
If they don’t, then they just end up as morally twisted caricatures of female toxicity, like these Mangionistas, longing after someone they’ll never have and destroying America in the process.
—
Two other datasets are going viral that deserve some commentary in this hulking screed. One is a dose of affirmation, and the other should cause us men to take a hard look at ourselves.
First, women who win the lottery are more likely than men to go nuts.
Obviously the university shmucks would frame this finding as evidence that family is just an oppressive, patriarchal structure. People with common sense, on the other hand, might conclude that for women, families are the mooring that keeps humanity structured and productive.
Men find meaning by gathering resources to attract a mate and provide, just like women derive meaning from being both dependent and depended upon. They’re like the spongey glue between patriarch and kin. Also, countless studies have shown this to be true. Female happiness is at its peak when they’re wedged between providing for dependent children and depending on a male provider.
—
Second, women in a testosterone study demonstrated some interesting results.
Women given actual testosterone dealt more fairly with business partners and drove conflict down. Women given a placebo who thought it was testosterone behaved more aggressively and selfishly.
Men all over X looked at this data and did a victory lap.
‘See? Women are delusional about men. We’re actually more better than they think we is.’
Except, that is not entirely true. It’s partly true, sure. Testosterone is a moderating hormone in many regards, especially fairness, justice, prudence, etc. We’ve known that for a while.
In the service we had this phrase: “Perception is reality.”
If you’re spending a lot of time privately with a married woman, it doesn’t matter if you aren’t actually having sex. That’s the way it appears to a neutral observer. Therefore, it’s perceived as probably true.
We ought to take a hard look at ourselves, gents, if women pantomiming men decide to be selfish, aggressive assholes. It can’t just be college indoctrination driving that perception.
We have to hold at least some of the bag on that one, guys.
—
It’s my contention that most of the problems facing women are largely the fault of men. I’ve said this in previous posts, and I still think it’s mostly true.
Lack of male leadership, lack of male strength and vision, lack of maleness period as a moderating force, and you get all kinds of insane nonsense. You get suicidal empathy. Women pining for mass murderers. Light sentences on 17-time violent offenders. No more gifted courses in public school because the dumb kids might feel bad. You get racial quotas in hiring and thought policing as an official policy in things like creative arts. You get a society that won’t lift a finger to defend itself out of fear doing so might register a microaggression.
And the ultimate truth, dear boys, is that when we men look at all the ailments perpetuated by wayward females, in effect, we’re just looking in the mirror and seeing our absence in the reflection.
MORE LINKS
So wrong.
—
Scientists Quietly Reverse Climate Doomsday Prediction Beloved By Corporate Media
Let’s make this reversal not quiet.
—
Parents Revolt After College Plans Surveillance Experiment On Little Kids
Good on them.
Like what you’re reading? If so, please consider subscribing to State of the Day or sharing this with a friend. You’d be supporting this newsletter and helping keep independent journalism alive.
If you are already a paid subscriber, make sure to join the conversation in our subscribers-only chat below.
