Hey y’all, welcome back to Unfit to Print.
Arguably the lowest IQ member of the House strikes again!
WE ELECT STUPID PEOPLE
Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett has twice stepped on a rake when it comes to the Epstein files.
Earlier this month, the Democrat rising star went on CNN to talk about a Jeffrey Epstein email released by the House Oversight Democrats that they claimed implicated Trump. The email refers to Trump as the “dog that hasn’t barked” and describes him as “spending hours” with one of Epstein’s victims. The name of said victim was redacted.
The victim in question was Virginia Giuffre, according to Oversight Republicans who had access to the unredacted email. Giuffre, before her untimely death, said repeatedly that she had never seen Trump engage in any sexual misconduct and that he was friendly to her when she worked at Mar-a-Lago.
Crockett responded to this quandary by stating that she wouldn’t take Republicans’ word on who the victim was, adding, “I don’t know why they [Republicans] would necessarily redact someone’s name who’s deceased at this point.”
“But Democrats did that though. The Democrats redacted…” CNN anchor Pamela Brown replied.
“No, no, no … I, I understand,” Crockett insisted, though it was clear she did not understand. “Our biggest concern is actually to make sure we are protecting victims.”
Nice pivot. When Crockett believed the Republicans redacted the name, she questioned why they would do that. When she was informed it was Democrats who did it, she claimed they were merely protecting victims.
The truth is that the Democrats redacted the name so they could insinuate that Trump had been untoward with one of Epstein’s victims. Naming Giuffre would immediately deflate that narrative because she is on the record denying Trump did anything wrong.
Crockett wasn’t done showing her ignorance.
Standing on the House floor Tuesday, Crockett insisted that Epstein had given political donations to multiple high-profile Republicans, including EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin.
“Folks who also took money from somebody named Jeffrey Epstein, as I had my team dig in very quickly. Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zeldin, George Bush, WinRed, McCain-Palin, Rick Lazio. I just want to be clear, if this is the standard that we’re going to make, just know we’re going to expose it all and just know that the FEC filings, they are available for everybody to review,” Crockett said.
Another oopsie. The FEC filings are indeed available for everyone to review, and they don’t say what she thinks they say.
Most of the donations she references — including the ones to Zeldin and WinRed — were made after Epstein died. What explains this conundrum? Believe it or not, there exists more than one person named Jeffrey Epstein. The Epstein who donated to Republicans was a random doctor living in New York, not the infamous sex offender.
Even funnier, some of the WinRed donations are obviously from a Democrat POSING as Jeffrey Epstein to make Republicans look bad. How do I know this? The FEC records show three of the donations were made in 2025 and are about $1 each. The listed occupation for this supposed Jeffrey Epstein is “CHILD MOLESTOR.”
That’s right, some Democrat tried to do a funny and couldn’t even spell molester correctly.
Very sloppy work, Miss Crockett!
WHAT ELSE IS ON MY RADAR
The Daily Caller just released their newest documentary and you don’t want to miss it. Watch below.
—
And they’re out. But the Dems will still find a way to complain.
Trump Signs Bill Ordering Release Of Epstein Files
—
Why do they care so much about Cory Mills?
Republicans Keep Democrat Crazies Off The Hook — To Protect Their Own Swamp Creature
—
It’s about time!
Joy Reid is About to be Canceled
—
All my homies hate Teen Vogue.
—
Reagan Reese reports:
Trump’s Sudden Flip On Epstein Files Vote, Explained
Like what you’re reading? If so, please consider subscribing to State of the Day or sharing this with a friend. You’d be supporting this newsletter and helping keep independent journalism alive.
If you are already a paid subscriber, make sure to join our subscribers-only chat below.
It’s important to recognize that some of “we“ are very stupid. I would like to see an amendment such that people who are “on the dole” (yes, I said it) are not allowed to vote. Many of them are ignorant and selfish and very motivated to continue to vote for anyone who will promise them more of other people‘s money.
I think they should also be required to send a thank you note to at least one taxpayer after each cash receipt.